THE OAXACA POLITICAL CRISIS AND THE ROOTS OF MIGRATION
Power-Point Presentation and Discussion
October 16, 2007
Review by Phoebe Hoss
On Tuesday, October 16, 2007, in All Souls Reidy Hall, Miguel
Ángel Vásquez de la Rosa spoke on how NAFTA, the North
American Free Trade Agreement, has further impoverished the people of
Mexico and, thereby, increased migration to the United States. This
program was sponsored by the Peace Task Force and Witness for Peace.
Mr. Vásquez de la Rosa is one of the founders of EDUCA (from the
Spanish initials for Services for an Alternative Education), a
nongovernmental organization that advocates for indigenous peoples in
the state of Oaxaca, helping small farmers and women to have fair
elections and cope with the judicial system. He was introduced by Ben
Beachy, regional organizer for the mid-Atlantic region of Educa, which
was sponsoring Mr. Vásquez de la Rosa's tour.
Mr. Vásques de la Rosa spent thirteen years
in the Oaxaca countryside, studying the effects of NAFTA. Oaxaca
reflects the crisis simmering in other underdeveloped nations: more
poverty; social, political, and economic exclusion; and authoritarian
rule. This Mexican state has a population of 3.5 million, with several
distinct ethnic groups, making it -- as he said -- the "indigenous
conscience of Mexico." Despite its great natural wealth, it is the
second poorest state in Mexico, with 76 percent of its people living in
extreme poverty and producing only 1.5 percent of Mexico's GDP. Under
NAFTA, small farmers find themselves competing against agribusiness and
inevitably lose out.
Moreover, free trade has resulted in a decline in the
production of basic grains and fruits: now, for example, the citizens
of Oaxaca may eat apples from California, not from their own orchards.
Furthermore, their water has become contaminated, as are many of the
seeds for corn they receive – in an area where corn originated;
or the corn is genetically modified.
People have two choices: whether to face the crisis
individually or collectively. The individual way is migration: hence,
the some 15 million Mexicans in the United States today, whose
remittances to their families are, along with tourism and coffee, one
of the three main sources of income in Oaxaca. The collective way is by
organizing.
In the spring of 2006, a social crisis exploded in
Oaxaca, with the strike of the 70,000-member teachers union, who were
demanding not only increased wages but more money for educational
supplies and support for poor students. We were shown pictures of the
government's brutal suppression of the strike and of the social
movement APPO, or Popular Assembly of the People of Oaxaca, a coalition
of over 300 local and state organizations that developed in response to
the government's repression. Over many months of violence, people were
shot, beaten, killed. "Now," said Mr. Vásquez, "we have a
government that rules by an iron fist."
What happened there, he said, could happen anywhere, even here in the United States.
In the question period, it was established that:
- About 70 percent of Oaxacan communities gained political autonomy.
- The Mexican government may not be held
accountable for its harsh repression of the teachers strike. Mexico's
judicial system is far behind that in the United States: the branches
of government are not clearly separated; nor are the resolutions of
such international organizations as Amnesty International binding.
- In respect to the role of the Catholic Church [he
didn't specify "Catholic," but that's all it can be, I think, though
there are active Protestant denominations in South America], one sector
of it is committed to justice; its members are openly involved and thus
likely to be imprisoned. The hierarchy, on the other hand, says the
Church is neutral and does nothing.
- As for criticisms of the teachers strike – such
as that it kept children out of school and the teachers were anyhow
earning more than other folks – they come from government
disinformation. Truth is he first thing to be lost in an authoritarian
government.
- To face trouble, we need to unify, to engage in
solidarity. "Solidarity is the kindness, the gentleness that there is
between people."
- To practice solidarity as North Americans, we need to
learn the truth about such situations. Then communicate that truth,
pass it on to others. After this talk, go out and blog on the internet.
Or get people to talk about the issues, how they relate to immigration.
Or go to Oaxaca, live there, see what's going on; join the delegation
going there in March 2008, 3/1-3/9/08. Or write your congresspeople to
vote against free trade for Peru and Colombia and against "Plan
Mexico," the multimillion-dollar military aid package, which is being
promoted by the administration as being only an "anti-drug"
plan.
At the conclusion of the presentation, a member of
the audience, Tami Gold, gave us with a video "Land Rain and Fire:
Report from Oaxaca," of which she is one of the producers. It is now in
the Peace Task Force's library.
|
|