CLEAN ENERGY REVOLUTION
TALK BY TED GLICK
March 4, 2008, 7:00 p.m. in Reidy Friendship Hall
Review by Phoebe Hoss
Ted Glick, who has been a progressive social activist since the late
1960s, became a climate activist in the summer of 2003 after the
extreme heat wave in Western Europe aroused him to the ongoing danger
of such extreme climate events (droughts, monsoons, etc.) to the earth
and our way of life. He is a co-founder of the Climate Crisis Coalition
and a coordinator for the U.S. Climate Emergency Council; his
twice-monthly column, "Future Hope" is available at:
http://www.ippn.org. His talk was sponsored by the All Souls Peace Task
Force, and he was introduced by Lawrene Groobart.
Mr. Glick was eloquent about the urgent need for a
clean energy revolution, saying that our survival depends on a major
policy shift in respect to energy. He warned that even with such a
shift, there will be decades of warming; our task is to avert
catastrophic climate change.
First, we have to curtail off our addiction to
fossil fuels – coal, oil, natural gas -- and shift to a worldwide
economy using clean and renewable sources of energy – solar
power, wind, tides -- that don't heat the earth. At the moment, oil
companies have a stranglehold on the fossil fuels, but wind power is
competitive with the production cost of coal. As for nuclear power, it
is not renewable.
We also need to reduce our use of energy. Today in
the United States, 30%-50% is wasted, while Europe -- with a similar
standard of living -- uses half what we do.
Today the worldwide demand for oil is growing, while
easily available oil is decreasing. We've extracted half of the oil in
the earth, what was relatively easy to take out; the second half is
much harder and more expensive to get at. Already we're setting up
permanent military bases in Africa to protect the sources of oil there.
Not only would a climate revolution reduce our
reliance on foreign oil and avoid catastrophic climate change, it would
create jobs by making for a green economy. "Green-collar workers," for
example, would be making houses more energy efficient, building more
public transportation, working on wind farms, and so forth.
Another benefit is that it would give power to the people, reducing the
power of remote corporations. Where today five out of the ten top
companies are oil companies, the people would control energy through
solar panels on a house's roof, and a community through its own
windmills.
Finally, in such a revolution the United States
would be able to cooperate with countries and people around the world
– rather than stand alone, as it does now, holding out on the
Kyoto Protocol.
Nonetheless, a climate movement is growing quietly
in this country, with such environmentalists as Bill McKibben and such
programs as the 1Sky Campaign, which makes science-based –
as opposed to political -- demands on the federal government. This
movement has been strongly supported by Nancy Pelosi of the House of
Representatives.
QUESTIONS
1.What about the Western states where there is little public
transportation and cars are necessary? GLICK: Extreme weather events
will keep happening and force change: "Reality will drive the shift."
2.Why are fasts such as Mr. Glick has undertaken (he started one on
9/4/07 on the return of Congress and lasted until 12/19/07) useful as a
protest, instead of speaking or writing? GLICK: It's a nonviolent way
of dramatizing people's feelings about and the urgency of an issue; it
catches people's attention, makes them think.
3.What of technology? GLICK: There's good technological development going on; there needs to be more.
4.Why isn't Al Gore a major energizer? GLICK: I don't know.
5.What about the pollution of the livestock industry? GLCK: 18% of
greenhouse gas emissions around the world come from food production.
6.What about individual changes in lifestyle? GLICK: That's the base,
but we need to go beyond with legislation and other measures.
7.Why hasn't the government done more? GLICK: While a Pentagon 2004
study did predict droughts and other catastrophes, it recommended
beefing up the military.
8.What of drought in the United States? GLICK: In 2007, 43% of the
country was in drought condition; and water wars between states are
going on now.
9.Does wind energy adversely affect the migration of birds?
GLICK: More birds are killed by cats than by windmills. These
have been modified to go slower, giving the same energy, and their
height has been lowered.
Finally, we need to have a positive relationship to the earth, not
exploiting it for ourselves but working for the benefit of all life
forms. If we fail in establishing such a relationship, there will be
ever more conflict -- as today in Iraq -- around the world. For the
massive change an energy revolution requires, we need a massive program
similar to the Manhattan Project, which developed the atomic bomb, but
one that would benefit everyone on earth. The climate revolution has to
be universal. |
|
|
|