|
Film: Iran (Is Not the Problem)
Review by Phoebe Hoss
February 8, 2009
On Sunday, February 8, at 1:00, the Peace Task Force presented the
documentary film entitled Iran (Is Not the Problem). This film was made
by Aaron Newman of the San Francisco Bay Area and featured local
activists from a variety of peace organizations: Majid Baradar, Sahar
Driver (the narrator), Larry Everest, David Glick, Robert Gould, Jim
Haber, Antonia Juhasz, Shahab Layeghi, Mitchel Plotnick, and Michael
Veiluva.
The film’s aim was to refute the
misinformation that our government disseminates, and that is not
carefully examined and criticized by the mainstream media. As the
journalist I. F. Stone said once, “Governments lie”; ours
is no exception. The film focuses on the U.S. government’s lies
in connection with Iran – a nation with whom at the time the film
was made the Bush Administration seemed bent on fomenting war, as it
had with Iraq.
The basic issue is oil. Two thirds of the
world’s oil and natural gas are in the Middle East, and the great
powers have long vied to control it. Hence, the United States has
supported dictatorships in the Middle East: Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and
Iran.
After 9/11, the Bush Administration aimed to launch
a boundless war on terror and, through it, achieve world domination.
Iraq was the first step. But that plan boomeranged, weakening the
United States, strengthening Iran, and enhancing terrorism around the
world. Although the administration has called the Iraq war a
“mistake,” it is not: it is a war crime. As would be an
attack on Iran.
To justify a war with Iran, the Bush Administration
promoted the idea that Iran is building or intends to build nuclear
weapons. But – according to the International Atomic Energy
Agency at the time of the film – there was no evidence that Iran
was doing either.
To understand the situation, people need to know the
basic history of modern Iran. In 1953, the United States, via the
C.I.A., overthrew the Iran government, assassinating the democratically
elected prime minister, Mohammed Mossadegh, who had nationalized the
oil industry. In his place, they installed the Shah, who allowed the
United States -- along with France, Great Britain, and the Netherlands
-- to own the oil. The Shah’s repressive government led, in time,
to major public protest; ultimately, in 1979, he was overthrown and an
Islamic government took over.. In 1980, Iraq invaded Iran, resulting in
eight years of war – a war in which the U.S. played both sides,
giving money and arms to Iraq even though it was using chemical
weapons. Indeed, Saddam Hussein was our ally until he invaded Kuwait in
1990.
Today Iran is a theocracy and doesn’t do the
United States’s bidding. The fact that it is a reactionary
and repressive government is, however, no excuse for our attacking it.
We need to recognize that its president, Mahmoud Ahmenidijab, is a
figurehead who loves to be provocative. On the other hand, the
Ayatollah Khomeni, who has the real power, has said he would be totally
willing to back the Saudi peace plan – a fact seldom mentioned in
the mainstream media.
Recently, the United States has threatened Iran. But
war is entirely unjustified – especially nowadays when the people
largely hurt by any war are not the soldiers fighting it but the
millions of civilians who get caught in it. As Howard Zinn says,
“No flag is large enough to cover innocent people.”
Rather than go to war, we need to learn the arts of
persuasion and cooperation. We need to stop thinking we’re
exceptional and not bound by international law. We need to appreciate
other countries’ history. We need to reduce our own weapons, to
support international law and justice and the World Court, and to
withdraw from Iraq and Afghanistan. We need, in sum, to renounce U.S.
imperialism and let the Iranians – and other people –
change their own country themselves.
Following the film, in the question-and-answer
period, some in the audience asked how they could find out what is
really going on. The answer lies in the non-mainstream media. Subscribe
to The Nation or The New York Review of Books or read them at your
library. Also, such websites as TomDispatch.com regularly have
illuminating articles. Moreover, the TomDispatch.com website lists a
variety of online sources -- such as truthdig.com or the great British
newspaper The Guardian -- that provide alternative and reliable
news. From both The Nation and the New York Review of Books, I knew,
for example, before we went to war with Iraq, that reliable observers
seriously doubted the existence of weapons of mass destruction in that
country.
|
|